<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Las Vegas Notebook &#8211; Part 3: The things they carried</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prrag.com/2006/07/05/las-vegas-notebook-part-3-the-things-they-carried/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prrag.com/2006/07/05/las-vegas-notebook-part-3-the-things-they-carried/</link>
	<description>The weblog of John Guilfoil</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:49:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blast - LapWorks Attaché Laptop Stand - The Online Magazine</title>
		<link>http://prrag.com/2006/07/05/las-vegas-notebook-part-3-the-things-they-carried/#comment-982</link>
		<dc:creator>Blast - LapWorks Attaché Laptop Stand - The Online Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prrag.com/?p=34#comment-982</guid>
		<description>[...] first experience with LapWorks came in July 2006 on a trip to Vegas, when I go to try their ultralight laptop stand. From what I remember in between eight-hour poker [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first experience with LapWorks came in July 2006 on a trip to Vegas, when I go to try their ultralight laptop stand. From what I remember in between eight-hour poker [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blast - LapWorks AttachÃ© Laptop Stand - The Online Magazine</title>
		<link>http://prrag.com/2006/07/05/las-vegas-notebook-part-3-the-things-they-carried/#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>Blast - LapWorks AttachÃ© Laptop Stand - The Online Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prrag.com/?p=34#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>[...] first experience with LapWorks came in July 2006 on a trip to Vegas, when I go to try their ultralight laptop stand. From what I remember in between eight-hour poker [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first experience with LapWorks came in July 2006 on a trip to Vegas, when I go to try their ultralight laptop stand. From what I remember in between eight-hour poker [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Bodami</title>
		<link>http://prrag.com/2006/07/05/las-vegas-notebook-part-3-the-things-they-carried/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Bodami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prrag.com/?p=34#comment-283</guid>
		<description>If you want something small, go with the canon sd630. There&#039;s nothing else in its price range that can compare to it
There&#039;s the new Panasonic with a 10x optical zoom and image stabilization, but it’s a bulky camera in comparison to the SD series and the picture quality isn&#039;t nearly that of the canon&#039;s.  However, my only grievance with the SD630 is that due to its immense 3.0&quot; LCD screen, it lacks a viewfinder, which I find to be inconvenient as the LCD drains the battery very quickly, and by choosing a slightly different Sd series model (say, the sd600, a camera who&#039;s features are the exact same as the sd630, just with a smaller screen) with a viewfinder, you can turn the lcd off and use the viewfinder in times that your battery life is low and still be able to take pictures for quite a bit longer that way.
 However, if you don’t mind a slightly smaller screen but with a viewfinder, look into either the sd600, which is $349, as I mentioned above, is 6 MP, 3x optical/4x digital zoom, or  the sd700, which is $499 but has 4x optical zoom/4x digital zoom, and 6 MP with the best optical image stabilization on the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want something small, go with the canon sd630. There&#8217;s nothing else in its price range that can compare to it<br />
There&#8217;s the new Panasonic with a 10x optical zoom and image stabilization, but it’s a bulky camera in comparison to the SD series and the picture quality isn&#8217;t nearly that of the canon&#8217;s.  However, my only grievance with the SD630 is that due to its immense 3.0&#8243; LCD screen, it lacks a viewfinder, which I find to be inconvenient as the LCD drains the battery very quickly, and by choosing a slightly different Sd series model (say, the sd600, a camera who&#8217;s features are the exact same as the sd630, just with a smaller screen) with a viewfinder, you can turn the lcd off and use the viewfinder in times that your battery life is low and still be able to take pictures for quite a bit longer that way.<br />
 However, if you don’t mind a slightly smaller screen but with a viewfinder, look into either the sd600, which is $349, as I mentioned above, is 6 MP, 3x optical/4x digital zoom, or  the sd700, which is $499 but has 4x optical zoom/4x digital zoom, and 6 MP with the best optical image stabilization on the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

